3 November 2013 - 20:30
Doctors Aided US Torture At Military Prisons

Doctors and nurses working under US military orders have been complicit in the abuse of terrorism suspects, a new independent US report says.

(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - Doctors and nurses working under US military orders have been complicit in the abuse of terrorism suspects, a new independent US report says. The study says medical professionals helped design, enable and participated in “torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment” of detainees, BBC reported. The report was compiled by an independent panel of military, health, ethics and legal experts. Both the CIA and the Pentagon have rejected the report’s findings. The two-year study was carried out by the Institute of Medicine and the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations. The report says the collusion began at US prisons in Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay in Cuba and at CIA secret detention sites after the 11 September 2001 attacks in the US. Co-author Leonard Rubenstein told the BBC’s Newsday program that the report revealed “the legacy of torture and detainee abuse at Guantanamo and elsewhere on the medical community”. “What we found was that the department of defense and the CIA actually changed core ethical standards to facilitate participation by health professionals in the abuse of detainees. And those distortions still exist,” he said. Force-Feeding The report says that while some practices such as waterboarding have now been banned, medical professionals are still being required to force-feed detainees, including those at Guantanamo Bay. “One [example] is the use of physicians to force-feed detainees and using very coercive restraint chairs in a way that violates the ethical standards of the World Medical Association and American medical groups,” said Rubenstein, Senior Scholar at the Center for Human Rights and Public Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Another is participation in interrogations where health professionals search for vulnerabilities which interrogators can exploit.”/149